[tahoe-dev] [tahoe-lafs] #630: explain debian compatibility: run-from-source vs run-from-.deb-package
tahoe-lafs
trac at allmydata.org
Tue Feb 17 18:27:12 PST 2009
#630: explain debian compatibility: run-from-source vs run-from-.deb-package
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: warner | Owner: somebody
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: undecided
Component: packaging | Version: 1.3.0
Keywords: debian | Launchpad_bug:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by zooko):
* cc: tahoe-dev@… (added)
Comment:
Thank you for writing this up! This is a good plan.
Now, as a matter of policy, which Debian/Ubuntu versions should we target
to meet the second kind of "supported" -- the apt-get-centric kind? I
suggest Ubuntu Hardy, Ubuntu Intrepid, and Debian Lenny. Zandr the
allmydata.com Ops Guy says that he is happy requiring Ubuntu Hardy on
things instead of having tahoe maintain apt-get-style compatibility with
Ubuntu Gutsy, and also the Tahoe-1.3.0 release doesn't have the apt-get-
centric kind of compatibility with Gutsy, since the Nevow installation on
Gutsy doesn't have a .egg-info file, and Tahoe-1.3.0 generates a bin/tahoe
executable using setuptools. (This may not have been entirely intended --
I didn't mean to make the bin/tahoe executable which worked on Gutsy in
Tahoe-1.2.0 stop working in Tahoe-1.3.0. Once we have the automated
testing described in this ticket then such unexpected changes will be less
common.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/630#comment:1>
tahoe-lafs <http://allmydata.org>
secure decentralized file storage grid
More information about the tahoe-dev
mailing list