[tahoe-dev] [tahoe-lafs] #683: So-called URIs aren't

tahoe-lafs trac at allmydata.org
Wed May 13 12:29:59 PDT 2009


#683: So-called URIs aren't
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  kpreid   |           Owner:  nobody   
     Type:  defect   |          Status:  new      
 Priority:  major    |       Milestone:  undecided
Component:  unknown  |         Version:  1.3.0    
 Keywords:           |   Launchpad_bug:           
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------

Comment(by kpreid):

 To be a little more explicit: in the message Zooko linked to, I allude to
 that if Tahoe directories contained general URIs, then you could insert a
 directory entry which is a revocable membrane to a Tahoe directory; this
 directory entry is not itself a Tahoe-type-URI because Tahoe, being
 distributed, cannot support revocation (there is no relied-upon agent in
 the grid to remember to abort access).

 (This wouldn't just require inserting URIs in tahoe directories, though;
 it would also require that clients are willing to switch between the
 crypto-and-DHT-based ('offline', in a sense) Tahoe protocols and a talk-
 to-one-server-which-proxies-for-you ('online') protocol. But storing URIs
 in directories at least lets clients *have the option of being so fancy*.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/683#comment:2>
tahoe-lafs <http://allmydata.org>
secure decentralized file storage grid


More information about the tahoe-dev mailing list