[tahoe-dev] benchmarking

[Thomas Delaet]

>>> IIRC the one which currently works the best is impl_c.
>>
>> That is the only one I got up and running with a few modifications ... ;-)
>
> Yay!  That's good news!  Would you please give us the patch of your
> modifications?

In attach.

> I'm leery of adding caching to Tahoe-LAFS proper because caching is usually
> a tradeoff of gaining performance at a cost of correctness, and the apps
> layered atop Tahoe-LAFS can know better than Tahoe-LAFS can which of those
> tradeoffs are wins for them.

I agree. If you add a cache, I would add it to your FUSE implementation.

> Aren't you going to tell us what you learned?

I was planning too, but I didn't learned anything up till now. I'm
still busy with test preparations ...

Kind Regards

Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blackmatch.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2047 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20090925/0c323cc6/attachment.bin