[tahoe-dev] Behavior when storage nodes go below shares.happy?

[Zooko O'Whielacronx]

> We had spoken about migrating the tahoe.cfg semantics from shares.happy
> to servers.happy... and I think that's a good thing (in time for 1.7.1?).

That's:

http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1092# shares.happy is the
wrong name of the measure

There's still time to get this in for 1.7.1! But I'm not prioritizing
it myself, so it needs someone else.

Regards,

Zooko