[tahoe-dev] zfec dependencies

[Greg Troxel]

Marc Tooley <tahoe-devPOST at quake.ca> writes:

> On Friday 23 July 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Still, does it make sense to add darcsver to pkgsrc?  I have already
>> made the package control files.
>
> Are you using darcs-2.4.4? darcs-2.0.2 or even darcs-2.2.0 both have a 
> problem on NetBSD whereby they can fail at datetime conversions. For 
> more information, see [1]. That link also contains the following patch 
> which fixes that specific issue:

I am not using darcs at all yet, just trying to get tahoe-lafs to
package cleanly.

I don't see any reason not to move pkgsrc to 2.4.4, assuming someone
here doesn't yell that it's broken.  So thanks for the 2.0/2.2 cautions,
but I'm inclined to move on.

> I am in the middle of creating a darcs-2.4.4 pkgsrc entry. I believe the 
> problem (and many others) are resolved in darcs-2.4.4 but this is based 
> only on speculation.

OK.  Check out pkgsrc-wip/darcs, which is at 2.3.99.2.  Improvements
welcome.  (I am not working on a darcs update.)

> P.S. I have a pubkey here with ID 1024D/32611E25 has expired and so your 
> GPG signatures are invalid. Is there a new key somewhere I can 
> download?

Yes, from keys.gnupg.net.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20100723/8ed13cde/attachment.pgp>