[tahoe-dev] Tahoe-LAFS is widely misunderstood
Greg Troxel
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Wed Feb 2 01:36:16 PST 2011
After looking at your Octavio page, I think your simplifications
relative to tahoe can be divided into several groups
no erasure coding; just replication. This gives up some performance,
but seems like a reasonable tradeoff for many.
Removal of CLI and WUI, and using only FUSE. This is the aspeect I'm
most in favor of.
Removal of introducer; presumably each client has to be configured
with all servers; I'm not sure this is a win.
You don't explain how you're dealing with repair, leases and garbage
collection, or why you don't need them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20110201/e8558562/attachment.pgp>
More information about the tahoe-dev
mailing list