[tahoe-dev] announcing pycryptopp v0.6.0.1206569328141510525648634803928199668821045408958

[markus reichelt]

* Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com> wrote:

> On NetBSD/i386 5.1_STABLE, "python2.6 setup.py test" passed.  A
> previous installation of tahoe-lafs-1.9.1 worked, so there seem to
> have been no ABI changes.

Same on Slackware 13.37.


> I think pycryptopp is a better name than zcryptopy, and that changing
> names is bad, only justified when the benefit outweighs the cost (do
> package names change?  do package systems support resolving name
> changes? (no...) ).

I agree

-- 
left blank, right bald
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20120318/92cb1af4/attachment.pgp>