[tahoe-dev] [tahoe-lafs] #867: use ipv6

[Greg Troxel]

kpneal at pobox.com writes:

> Is there really a need to restate the protocol next to the address? The
> two address formats (dotted quad vs colons) are different enough that it
> should already be clear which is which. Just curious.

For humans, I do not find the addresses confusing in terms of what is v4
vs v6 so the ipv6: and ipv4: are just taking up space and making things
harder to read.

Also, fe80:: addresses should probably be ignored, as they are meant to
be used only on a single link.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20130215/c9b71cd7/attachment.pgp>