[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #1385: stop respecting the pre-v1.3.0 configuration files
tahoe-lafs
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Mon Apr 11 13:13:49 PDT 2011
#1385: stop respecting the pre-v1.3.0 configuration files
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: zooko | Owner:
Type: | Status: new
enhancement | Milestone: 1.9.0
Priority: minor | Version: 1.8.2
Component: code- | Keywords: docs configuration defaults
nodeadmin | usability
Resolution: |
Launchpad Bug: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by warner):
I'd like some sort of warning in a release or two, but Zooko says he's
writing code to detect-and-complain-about the old files, which I'm happy
with as long as we have a plan to remove it eventually (probably around
the 2.0 timeframe) (so we don't accumulate old cruft forever). Note that
it'd probably be sufficient to do a fatal complaint about the lack of a
{{{tahoe.cfg}}}, because the nodes that were configured with individual
files probably won't have one, and that sort of complaint could be kept
around forever.
I'm ok with regressing on multiple-log-gatherers until Foolscap has an API
to handle that. I'd prefer the whitespace-separated tahoe.cfg key over
having a separate file with a funny name.
(note that part of the reason for having discrete files for things like
log-gatherers was to make it easy to set up or modify a whole bunch of
Allmydata servers with a batch of {{{scp}}} commands: just stuff the
{{{log-gatherer.furl}}} file into all of them and then bounce them all. To
do that with {{{tahoe.cfg}}} requires editing files, so needs more complex
tooling. But I don't think this is an important feature these days, and I
prefer the simplicity of a single config file).
--
Ticket URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1385#comment:7>
tahoe-lafs <http://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list