[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #668: easy_install allmydata-tahoe is broken
tahoe-lafs
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Tue Jan 18 05:18:22 UTC 2011
#668: easy_install allmydata-tahoe is broken
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: francois | Owner: zooko
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 1.8.2
Component: packaging | Version: 1.3.0
Resolution: | Keywords: setuptools install ubuntu debian test-needed review-needed
Launchpad Bug: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by zooko):
Replying to [comment:23 davidsarah]:
> Replying to [comment:22 zooko]:
>
> Shouldn't recommend, or should recommend against?
We should definitely focus of [http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-
lafs/trunk/docs/quickstart.html quickstart.html], and don't people
alternatives to quickstart.html unless they specifically ask or have some
specific needs that don't fit quickstart.html.
I personally wouldn't go so far as to recommend ''against'' using
{{{easy_install}}} just because it is sort of beyond the scope of Tahoe-
LAFS. Once we merge #1054 then Tahoe-LAFS works with {{{easy_install}}} at
least as well as any other Python package does, and people have developed
their own opinions and techniques about it. On the other hand, [http
://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/668?replyto=23#comment:19 your
specific reason] to recommend against it is novel as far as I know and
potentially quite useful knowledge to others. It isn't Tahoe-LAFS specific
and might be best expressed in a bug report or an email message to
distutils-sig.
So, I'm ±0 on dis-recommending {{{easy_install allmydata-tahoe}}}.
--
Ticket URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/668#comment:27>
tahoe-lafs <http://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list