[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #932: benchmark Tahoe-LAFS compared to nosql dbs

[tahoe-lafs]

#932: benchmark Tahoe-LAFS compared to nosql dbs
-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
     Reporter:  zooko          |      Owner:  bibilthaysose
         Type:  enhancement    |     Status:  assigned
     Priority:  major          |  Milestone:  undecided
    Component:  dev-           |    Version:  1.5.0
  infrastructure               |   Keywords:  scalability performance large
   Resolution:                 |
Launchpad Bug:                 |
-------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment (by bibilthaysose):

 Hi zooko, org.apache.http.[...] is the client-side web interface that I'm
 using.  If you followed the link that I provided, you should have seen
 some org.apache.[...] stuff.  That's what I was referring to.  It turns
 out that in the Java community, the apache http classes are preferred to
 the native Java ones.  Go figure!  Anywho, I believe I've ironed out most
 of the problems I was having there.  I'm currently talking to one of the
 maintainers of the MongoDB YCSB layer to find out how to get this merged
 into the YCSB repo, or at least reviewed by someone who knows Java and
 YCSB.  That reminds me: _PLEASE_REVIEW_THIS_CODE_ (when you get a chance):

 https://github.com/grubino/Tahoe-YCSB--Interface-Layer

 I'm I've run afoul of Java best practices and general best practices, and
 I invite anyone reading this to pleez point out my mistakes to me.  I've
 looked over the code and have found a few things that I want to fix, but
 I'm sure I'm missing some stuff.  Also, and not least of all, having
 reviewers makes me feel loved.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/932#comment:6>
tahoe-lafs <http://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage