[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #1657: Sneakernet grid scenario

[tahoe-lafs]

#1657: Sneakernet grid scenario
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------
     Reporter:  amontero     |      Owner:  nobody
         Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  new
     Priority:  major        |  Milestone:  undecided
    Component:  unknown      |    Version:  1.8.3
   Resolution:               |   Keywords:  sneakernet repair location
Launchpad Bug:               |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by davidsarah):

 * keywords:   => sneakernet repair location


Comment:

 I meant, how is (k, (k+1)*H, (k+1)*Z) for k > 1 and (k+1) shares on each
 node, better than (1, H, Z)? They have approximately the same reliability,
 but (1, H, Z) is simpler and has a slightly lower expansion factor. The
 extra share on each node doesn't make much difference to reliability
 because bit flips are not much more likely than whole node failures.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1657#comment:7>
tahoe-lafs <https://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage