[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #1941: when an upload fails, link to a full explanation of what happened
tahoe-lafs
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Tue Apr 9 19:23:40 UTC 2013
#1941: when an upload fails, link to a full explanation of what happened
---------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: zooko | Owner: davidsarah
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: undecided
Component: unknown | Version: 1.9.2
Keywords: | Launchpad Bug:
---------------------+----------------------------
I heard that the volunteergrid2 project has shut down. The participants,
in explaining why they gave up on it, said that they often got
"unhappiness errors" when they tried to upload files, so therefore they
never trusted the grid with their backups.
There are two problems here that this ticket attempts to address:
1. They didn't trust the grid. Why? Not because the upload failed, but
because **they didn't know why the uploaded had failed**. They interpreted
this as evidence that Tahoe-LAFS was buggy or unreliable. If they had seen
a clear, understandable explanation that said "This upload failed because
you specified you required at least 15 servers, and of the 20 servers on
your grid, 10 of them are currently unreachable.", then they would have
continued to trust the Tahoe-LAFS software and they would have known what
changes to make (to their grid or their happiness parameter) to get what
they wanted.
2. We (the tahoe-lafs developers) don't know why their uploads failed.
Perhaps Tahoe-LAFS was harboring some previously-unknown bug. Perhaps too
many of their servers were on flaky home DSL that timed-out most requests.
Perhaps it was something else. We can't improve the software without a
working feedback loop whereby we can learn the details of failures.
This ticket is to make it so that when an upload fails, you can read an
understandable story of what happened that led to the failure, specifying
which servers your client tried to use and what each server did.
Note that the basic information of how many servers were reachable, etc.,
is encoded into the error message that users currently see, but users do
not read that error message, because it contains a Python traceback, so
they just gloss over it. So this ticket is to make two changes to that:
1. Add more information. Not just the number of servers that failed, but
which specific servers (identifiers, nicknames, IP addresses) and when.
2. Make it a human-oriented HTML page, not a Python traceback. Most users
will not read anything that contains a Python traceback.
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1941>
tahoe-lafs <https://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list