[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #1946: consider removing some st_* fields from metadata
tahoe-lafs
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Thu Apr 18 13:04:44 UTC 2013
#1946: consider removing some st_* fields from metadata
------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: daira | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: soon
Component: code | Version: 1.9.2
Resolution: | Keywords: privacy anonymity
Launchpad Bug: |
------------------------+-------------------------------
Comment (by gdt):
Stepping back, I think metadata gets used for three things, and we should
think about them separately:
* normal vfs operations like any other filesystem. This is hard, and I
think we should look to other filesystems to see what they do about
uid/gid and username mappings. zooko's point about unanchored uids is
totally sensible. AFS is perhaps a good example, because while it lacks
the cypherpunk flavor, it has large scale. But, it's a bit centralized in
terms of adminsitration.
* wide-scale sharing. Here, filesystems blur into publishing systems.
* backup: here, we want to store metadata to be used later, but it's
really part of the data of the backup, not metadata about files.
My complaint about 'tahoe backup' is that I don't see any good reason to
couple the backup program and the filesystem. All the reasons about local
storage of metadata about what's there, etc. should apply to any back-end
storage.
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1946#comment:9>
tahoe-lafs <https://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list