[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #1746: write test for anti-Ubuntu-crash-reporter exception-catching code

tahoe-lafs trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Thu Jan 3 03:23:39 UTC 2013


#1746: write test for anti-Ubuntu-crash-reporter exception-catching code
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
     Reporter:           |      Owner:  zooko
  ChosenOne              |     Status:  new
         Type:  defect   |  Milestone:  1.10.0
     Priority:  normal   |    Version:  1.9.1
    Component:  code-    |   Keywords:  cli ubuntu apport usability error
  frontend-cli           |  review-needed
   Resolution:           |
Launchpad Bug:           |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by davidsarah):

 * keywords:  cli ubuntu apport usability error test-needed => cli ubuntu
     apport usability error review-needed
 * owner:  davidsarah => zooko


Old description:

> Hey,
>
> I just noticed that 'tahoe put' (without any parameters, in an
> unconfigured state) might throw an IOError (No such file or directory:
> u'~/.tahoe/node.url').
>
> While this itself is a little unfriendly towards user, it is also causing
> the Ubuntu 'Crash report' application the show up. The 'crash report'
> appears to be a new features in Ubuntu 12.04. Apparently, it's sitting in
> the background looking for failures/exceptions and nags people who know
> what they do :P
>
> This may lead to bad statistics at Ubuntu about tahoe's stability. Also,
> it's pretty annoying. :)
>
> (See attachment)

New description:

 Hey,

 I just noticed that 'tahoe put' (without any parameters, in an
 unconfigured state) might throw an IOError (No such file or directory:
 u'~/.tahoe/node.url').

 While this itself is a little unfriendly towards user, it is also causing
 the Ubuntu 'Crash report' application the show up. The 'crash report'
 appears to be a new features in Ubuntu 12.04. Apparently, it's sitting in
 the background looking for failures/exceptions and nags people who know
 what they do :P

 This may lead to bad statistics at Ubuntu about tahoe's stability. Also,
 it's pretty annoying. :)

 (See attachment)

--

Comment:

 Please review: [https://github.com/davidsarah/tahoe-
 lafs/commit/64e326e211d4b08e543feb98c45d382dce519fab]

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1746#comment:17>
tahoe-lafs <https://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage


More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream mailing list