[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [tahoe-lafs] #1325: make `tahoe backup` keep more filesystem metadata
tahoe-lafs
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Thu Nov 28 01:50:14 UTC 2013
#1325: make `tahoe backup` keep more filesystem metadata
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: chrysn | Owner: nobody
Type: | Status: new
enhancement | Milestone: undecided
Priority: major | Version: 1.8.1
Component: unknown | Keywords: tahoe-backup metadata symlink
Resolution: | hardlink
Launchpad Bug: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by amontero):
* cc: amontero@… (added)
Old description:
> there is a number of probems due to which `tahoe backup` can not replace
> rsync style backups yet. the core of the problem is that tahoe-lafs can
> not keep all the information that is stored in a posix style file system.
> the issues i see are:
>
> * ctime/mtime is not saved
> * symlinks can not be saved (compare ticket #641, which has been around
> for two years)
> * other special files can not be saved (devices etc)
> * user, group and permissions are not saved
> * acls are not saved
>
> i am aware that tahoe has its own ways of dealing with permissions, that
> it has its own time stamps, and that directories work in a way that every
> directory entry is kind of a link anyway, but that's not the point --
> it's about being able to restore a disk's contents from a backup.
>
> from my point of view, symlinks, times and user/group/permissions are the
> most important of these; device files are nowadays created on a ramdisk
> on the fly anyway, and acl users know the problem well enough to have
> their workarouds (afair this is an issue with most backup systems).
>
> implementation-wise, i guess that most if not all of this can be stored
> in the directory as additional information.
>
> if it is possible in trac, i suggest all related bugs to be marked as
> "blocking" this bug.
>
> is this something that is realistic to achieve for tahoe-lafs?
New description:
there is a number of probems due to which `tahoe backup` can not replace
rsync style backups yet. the core of the problem is that tahoe-lafs can
not keep all the information that is stored in a posix style file system.
the issues i see are:
* ctime/mtime is not saved
* symlinks can not be saved (compare ticket #641, which has been around
for two years)
* other special files can not be saved (devices etc)
* user, group and permissions are not saved
* acls are not saved
i am aware that tahoe has its own ways of dealing with permissions, that
it has its own time stamps, and that directories work in a way that every
directory entry is kind of a link anyway, but that's not the point -- it's
about being able to restore a disk's contents from a backup.
from my point of view, symlinks, times and user/group/permissions are the
most important of these; device files are nowadays created on a ramdisk on
the fly anyway, and acl users know the problem well enough to have their
workarouds (afair this is an issue with most backup systems).
implementation-wise, i guess that most if not all of this can be stored in
the directory as additional information.
if it is possible in trac, i suggest all related bugs to be marked as
"blocking" this bug.
is this something that is realistic to achieve for tahoe-lafs?
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1325#comment:5>
tahoe-lafs <https://tahoe-lafs.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list