[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [Tahoe-LAFS] #661: Dynamic share migration to maintain file health
Tahoe-LAFS
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Mon Dec 29 20:21:04 UTC 2014
#661: Dynamic share migration to maintain file health
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mmore | Owner:
Type: | Status: closed
enhancement | Milestone: undecided
Priority: major | Version: 1.3.0
Component: code- | Keywords: repair preservation availability
encoding |
Resolution: duplicate |
Launchpad Bug: |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by daira):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => duplicate
Old description:
> Dynamic share repair to maintain file health. based on the following
> features
> already exist in Allmydata-Tahoe1.3 we can improve automatic repair:
>
> 1. Foolscap provides the knowledge of the alive nodes.
>
> 2. Verification of file availability can be delegated to other node
> through
> read-cap or a verify-cap without security risk.
>
> The proposed auto repair process:
>
> 1. Using memory-based algorithm, because client know where the file
> shares
> exist so we can keep tack of alive file shares, for simplicity we
> consider that share availability from its node availability.
>
> 2. repair process triggered automatically from the repairer, repair
> responsibility has many technique based repair cost ; network
> bandwidth
> and fault tolerant.
>
> 3. time out , we can use lazy repair technique to avoid node temporary
> node
> failure, i.e waiting for a certain time before repair process starts.
>
> 4. reintegration, using memory-based repair technique remembering failed
> storage servers, who come back to life, will help in reducing Tahoe
> grid
> resources such as network bandwidth and storage space.
>
> 5. repairer, selection of repair responsibly takes many issues into
> consideration: security , repairer location , repairer resources.
New description:
Dynamic share repair to maintain file health. based on the following
features
already exist in Allmydata-Tahoe1.3 we can improve automatic repair:
1. Foolscap provides the knowledge of the alive nodes.
2. Verification of file availability can be delegated to other node
through
read-cap or a verify-cap without security risk.
The proposed auto repair process:
1. Using memory-based algorithm, because client know where the file
shares
exist so we can keep tack of alive file shares, for simplicity we
consider that share availability from its node availability.
2. repair process triggered automatically from the repairer, repair
responsibility has many technique based repair cost ; network
bandwidth
and fault tolerant.
3. time out , we can use lazy repair technique to avoid node temporary
node
failure, i.e waiting for a certain time before repair process starts.
4. reintegration, using memory-based repair technique remembering failed
storage servers, who come back to life, will help in reducing Tahoe
grid
resources such as network bandwidth and storage space.
5. repairer, selection of repair responsibly takes many issues into
consideration: security , repairer location , repairer resources.
--
Comment:
Duplicate of #543.
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/661#comment:5>
Tahoe-LAFS <https://Tahoe-LAFS.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list