[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [zfec] #17: remove dependency on zbase32 and pyutil
zfec
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Wed Mar 19 21:20:34 UTC 2014
#17: remove dependency on zbase32 and pyutil
----------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: daira | Owner: zooko
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: component1 | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: zbase32 pyutil
Launchpad Bug: |
----------------------------+----------------------------
Description changed by zooko:
Old description:
> These are weak dependencies in the sense that zfec will work without
> them, but they have confused users and packagers of Tahoe-LAFS (e.g. see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683331), and are
> potential sources of packaging bugs. For example...
>
> Alan Fairless at SpiderOak wrote:
> > FYI: I just noticed that newest zbase32 and pyutil are now mutually
> dependent on each other.
> >
> > In order to make the toolchain builder happy, I'm first installing
> zbase32 1.1.3, then pyutil 1.9.7, then upgrade zbase32 to 1.3.5.
New description:
These are weak dependencies in the sense that zfec will work without them,
but they have confused users and packagers of Tahoe-LAFS (e.g. see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683331), and are
potential sources of packaging bugs. For example...
Alan Fairless at !SpiderOak wrote:
> FYI: I just noticed that newest zbase32 and pyutil are now mutually
dependent on each other.
>
> In order to make the toolchain builder happy, I'm first installing
zbase32 1.1.3, then pyutil 1.9.7, then upgrade zbase32 to 1.3.5.
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://www.tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec/ticket/17#comment:3>
zfec <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec>
efficient erasure-coding library
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list