[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [Tahoe-LAFS] #3048: Direct dependence of storage client code on the RIStorageServer RemoteReference creates tight coupling and inflexibility
Tahoe-LAFS
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Fri May 31 14:50:09 UTC 2019
#3048: Direct dependence of storage client code on the RIStorageServer
RemoteReference creates tight coupling and inflexibility
---------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: exarkun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: undecided
Component: unknown | Version:
Keywords: | Launchpad Bug:
---------------------+---------------------------
`allmydata.storage_client.NativeStorageClient` provides the functionality
to *get* a `RemoteReference` for the server-published `RIStorageServer`
but offers little or not abstractions beyond that.
All storage client application code has `get_rref` and `callRemote` calls
sprinkled throughout.
This couples all of that storage client application code tightly to both
the `RemoteReference` and `RIStorageServer` interfaces. In turn, this
makes it difficult to make changes to either of these.
If we want Tahoe-LAFS to switch to an HTTP-based protocol then tight
coupling to `RemoteReference` is an undesirable thing.
If we want to enhance the storage server protocol then tight coupling to
`RIStoragerServer` is also an undesirable thing.
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/3048>
Tahoe-LAFS <https://Tahoe-LAFS.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list