[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [Tahoe-LAFS] #3787: Is the use of Pipeline for write actually necessary?

Tahoe-LAFS trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Thu Sep 2 19:28:19 UTC 2021


#3787: Is the use of Pipeline for write actually necessary?
----------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  itamarst  |          Owner:
     Type:  task      |         Status:  new
 Priority:  normal    |      Milestone:  HTTP Storage Protocol
Component:  unknown   |        Version:  n/a
 Keywords:            |  Launchpad Bug:
----------------------+---------------------------------------
 It was added in #392, but I really don't understand the reasoning.

 It makes a bit more sense if you replace the word "pipeline" with
 "batcher" when reading the code, but I still don't understand why round-
 trip-time is improved by this approach.

--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/3787>
Tahoe-LAFS <https://Tahoe-LAFS.org>
secure decentralized storage


More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream mailing list