[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [Tahoe-LAFS] #3787: Is the use of Pipeline for write actually necessary?
Tahoe-LAFS
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Thu Sep 2 19:28:19 UTC 2021
#3787: Is the use of Pipeline for write actually necessary?
----------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: itamarst | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: HTTP Storage Protocol
Component: unknown | Version: n/a
Keywords: | Launchpad Bug:
----------------------+---------------------------------------
It was added in #392, but I really don't understand the reasoning.
It makes a bit more sense if you replace the word "pipeline" with
"batcher" when reading the code, but I still don't understand why round-
trip-time is improved by this approach.
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/3787>
Tahoe-LAFS <https://Tahoe-LAFS.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list