[tahoe-lafs-trac-stream] [Tahoe-LAFS] #3856: sFTP integration test failures
Tahoe-LAFS
trac at tahoe-lafs.org
Mon Jan 10 15:00:43 UTC 2022
#3856: sFTP integration test failures
----------------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: meejah | Owner: itamarst
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: undecided
Component: code-frontend-ftp-sftp | Version: n/a
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Launchpad Bug: |
----------------------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by exarkun):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
For reference, the fix landed via https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-
lafs/pull/1169 in https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-
lafs/commit/4cdbf7fb0cb1a462f4edf6ed93a74dc6f4df0499
To the question of whether this ticket should be open or closed: one
ticket, one PR.
As you say, the problem is solved: the SFTP integration tests no longer
fail because of this Paramiko regression. I don't even know that removing
the pin is sensible after Paramiko fixes the issue. The most obvious
thing that does is open us up to future regressions.
Maybe we want to revisit the pin in a month or a year or something and
move it to a newer version if there is some interesting reason to do so.
The same probably applies to all of our dependencies. Do we want to track
that work with a ticket or some other way? A ticket sounds kind of nice
but I'm not convinced it would actually remind anyone to do anything in,
say, six months. More likely it will just get lost in the pile.
--
Ticket URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/3856#comment:5>
Tahoe-LAFS <https://Tahoe-LAFS.org>
secure decentralized storage
More information about the tahoe-lafs-trac-stream
mailing list