Hi... On 05.04.2012 18:34, Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote: > Nononono! > We should have goals of 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, ... > More geeky. 2^n, you know. > And where is the 42?!? I won't accept missing the 42! Other than that, I'd go either with your suggested (2^x) row or otherwise with an e-function .-) floor(e^x)... it's just more "natural" best kruemi