[volunteergrid2-l] 14 of 20 connections, just me or more general problem?

Sat Jul 28 07:32:29 UTC 2012

Yeah... my node has been down at that time. Tahoe had died with a segfault.
Unfortunately I'm off the grid in my holiday location (unfortunately
only in the sense that i won't be able to take care of my node...
otherwise it is quite relaxing to have no mobile connection). So I've
just restarted tahoe on the 24th and it seems to run fine since than.

I'll be away the fallowing week as well. So if something happens with my
node I most probably won't be able to do something about it.

I have checked all the log files and since 23th there seems to be no
indication of any stability issues.
I hope that I will soon find the time to replace this old server with
some newer hardware.

have a good summer time!

best regards

Marco

On 23.07.2012 00:56, erpo41 at gmail.com wrote:
> Scratch that. After restarting tahoe a couple of times (for reasons
> unrelated to your problem), I now show no connection
> to stercor at gmail.com-timesoak and marco.tedaldi at gmail.com
> <mailto:marco.tedaldi at gmail.com>.
> 
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:21 PM, erpo41 at gmail.com
> <mailto:erpo41 at gmail.com> <erpo41 at gmail.com <mailto:erpo41 at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> 
>     Check your NAT. I show connections to 20/20. As of right now, my
>     status page shows this:
> 
>     Service Name Nickname PeerID Connected? Since First Announced Version
> 
>     storage ianchov at gmail.com <mailto:ianchov at gmail.com>
>     aty4re3a3ygvb6a2gext5vbcgdzs4ihk Yes: to 78.83.249.174:55392
>     <http://78.83.249.174:55392> 07:18:13 19-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.2
> 
>     storage bradrupp at gmail.com-sln baeq4skxppta2cc6wnjfv7k2uu7ms4b6 Yes:
>     to 75.148.96.186:52497 <http://75.148.96.186:52497> 14:21:42 18-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.8.3
> 
>     storage pascal.bach at gmx.ch-Horus b55ww7wazcrwu4owhlxpmvx6qvr4p3iy
>     Yes: to 77.58.115.70:62481 <http://77.58.115.70:62481> 17:45:58
>     17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage stercor at gmail.com-timesoak eitox2f44ezztyentwyqo3ufibij53ol
>     Yes: to 174.98.163.93:48692 <http://174.98.163.93:48692> 15:12:11
>     22-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage steve.dodson at gmail.com-hiro gbytbnxw2hkbpjslf7mevzejefmdomtb
>     Yes: to 70.57.245.246:33386 <http://70.57.245.246:33386> 17:36:58
>     17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.8.3
> 
>     storage erpo41 at gmail.com-io gehsg7izqczzmsulewl7k7hf3nzckfd5 Yes: to
>     (loopback) 17:36:57 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage steve.dodson at gmail.com-rhp997
>     g4xvpwqadyiwfu26qfxkgmjjxmony52p Yes: to 63.233.155.10:33386
>     <http://63.233.155.10:33386> 17:36:58 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.8.3
> 
>     storage christoph at rosenkeller.org-bender
>     hpd3hn75ggwujdsacpd47r4yj6tahutj Yes: to 141.35.60.60:32121
>     <http://141.35.60.60:32121> 17:36:59 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.8.3
> 
>     storage slush at centrum.cz-future huadamis74e2mwtgiq23a2jm5l7m72hi
>     Yes: to 84.42.190.168:9001 <http://84.42.190.168:9001> 17:36:59
>     17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.8.3
> 
>     storage cerezal at gmx.net-cerezal inxoy6uiulkr2uwm6s3rmz6jzyiywkvi
>     Yes: to 84.135.40.179:59036 <http://84.135.40.179:59036> 13:59:52
>     22-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage fb at frederik-braun.com-srv2 i7xwtcekpmzmic7dpsidcvjpbimjshqc
>     Yes: to 5.9.24.38:33892 <http://5.9.24.38:33892> 17:36:59
>     17-Jul-2012 17:36:57 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     allmydata-tahoe/1.9.0-r5601
> 
>     storage jharris at harrisdev.com-Cat jbrse33y3gmtpauhhgfsrti4o4mzlcsk
>     Yes: to 68.233.149.2:8766 <http://68.233.149.2:8766> 17:36:58
>     17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.6.1
> 
>     storage sabotrax at gmail.com <mailto:sabotrax at gmail.com>
>     kqyu52yzkipbt5ktyu6x56s6isi2khyc Yes: to 88.134.78.223:3917
>     <http://88.134.78.223:3917> 17:36:59 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage marco.tedaldi at gmail.com <mailto:marco.tedaldi at gmail.com>
>     kvj2xrmmti3wp2albm3mmo3ulead5fy2 Yes: to 178.82.223.84:37218
>     <http://178.82.223.84:37218> 04:44:12 22-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.8.3
> 
>     storage bradjgreer at gmail.com-fuzzy1 otedzi6b3wnhhg7g35xnrv7ulnaji57y
>     Yes: to 140.142.111.129:33892 <http://140.142.111.129:33892>
>     17:36:58 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage shawn at willden.org-gratch pmitrhwg7hminstxvijbyzefsovwq7hf
>     Yes: to 173.160.54.21:45625 <http://173.160.54.21:45625> 17:36:58
>     17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage bradrupp at gmail.com-if3-1 qivwuhf6cnon45sld7lq5a3iugsjjqmw
>     Yes: to 50.8.68.88:33892 <http://50.8.68.88:33892> 17:36:58 17-Jul-2012
> 
>     17:36:57 17-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage dmitriy.kazimirov at viorsan.com-miurr3
>     t3zmoebascafpubaz3rpfqrllkx3fmjl Yes: to 92.255.176.201:49341
>     <http://92.255.176.201:49341> 05:30:51 20-Jul-2012
> 
>     03:48:43 20-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.2
> 
>     storage masterme120 at gmail.com <mailto:masterme120 at gmail.com>
>     vd5cwd7r52kts4ccxbih5kfz7d7h3dhw Yes: to 108.208.136.103:33626
>     <http://108.208.136.103:33626> 16:26:29 21-Jul-2012
> 
>     20:41:49 18-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     storage secorp at gmail.com <mailto:secorp at gmail.com>
>     5zmw5gk65f4czfx2hvh7qihdpiosb56e Yes: to 75.101.48.136:57367
>     <http://75.101.48.136:57367> 15:18:53 22-Jul-2012
> 
>     15:18:52 22-Jul-2012 allmydata-tahoe/1.9.1
> 
>     On Jul 22, 2012 2:52 PM, "Peter Secor" <secorp at gmail.com
>     <mailto:secorp at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Hi all,
> 
>           I am in the midst of upgrading my node to 1.9.2 and noticed
>         that only 14 of 20 nodes are connected which seems a bit low.
>         Thoughts or comments?
> 
>         Ps
> 