[tahoe-dev] dirnode root/leaf depth (was: Benchmark and scaling figures and how to lockdown a tahoe-lafs grid...)

[Shawn Willden]

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Nathan Eisenberg <nathan at atlasnetworks.us>wrote:

> > Even with 40 machines, you shouldn't run into any issues with
> > scalability from a performance perspective.  The commercial allmydata
> > site had far more than that.
>
> You know, thinking about this - why should directories not be K=1,
> M=$numservers?  This would seem to be very roughly akin to a distributed
> MFT?  Surely this data doesn't consume a significant amount of storage?
>

Or at least be able to choose different parameters (presumably with greater
redundancy) for dirnodes.  I agree.

-- 
Shawn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20101107/3fae9843/attachment.html>