[tahoe-dev] server selection Re: Node correlations - [Was] best practice for wanting to setup multiple tahoe instances on a single node

[Ted Rolle Jr.]

Can 'happiness' be a three or more dimensional issue?
Can it, with little more effort, be coded to handle more than two
dimensions?
It's hard to think in more than two dimensions when coding, but I'll wager
that there would be advantages that develop 'down the road.'

Ted, the really old coder, some would say too old.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:59, Olaf TNSB <still.another.person at gmail.com>wrote:

> An outstanding issue, in my mind, that could wait for v2 of the
> implementation:
> - perhaps the happiness test should be 2 dimensional. That is, I might
> want to satisfy more than one happiness measure (i.e. h1 shares based on
> rule set 1, then h2 shares from rule set 2, ..., then whatever is left
> wherever.
>
> _______________________________________________
> tahoe-dev mailing list
> tahoe-dev at tahoe-lafs.org
> http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
>
>


-- 
GPG/PGP public key: B07F9AAE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20120118/acd8bf6e/attachment.html>