[tahoe-dev] several questions about tahoe backup

[Brian Warner]

On 3/17/12 3:31 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:

> That makes sense, but it would be really nice if the repair process on a
> directory that has 9 of the 10 shares it should would result in placing
> a copy of the missing share without incrementing the version; I find
> that's a huge source of churn in a grid with mostly-present nodes
> (e.g. pubgrid).  My sense is that's the biggest win in repair stability,
> and removes most of the trouble.

Oh, yeah, that's definitely a great idea. Didn't we have a ticket about
that? I couldn't see anything on the list[1] that specifically mentioned it.

cheers,
 -Brian

[1]:
https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/query?status=!closed&component=code-mutable&order=priority