[tahoe-dev] several questions about tahoe backup

[Greg Troxel]

Brian Warner <warner at lothar.com> writes:

> On 3/17/12 3:31 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> That makes sense, but it would be really nice if the repair process on a
>> directory that has 9 of the 10 shares it should would result in placing
>> a copy of the missing share without incrementing the version; I find
>> that's a huge source of churn in a grid with mostly-present nodes
>> (e.g. pubgrid).  My sense is that's the biggest win in repair stability,
>> and removes most of the trouble.
>
> Oh, yeah, that's definitely a great idea. Didn't we have a ticket about
> that? I couldn't see anything on the list[1] that specifically mentioned it.

https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1209