[tahoe-dev] What will happen if combine LAFS with Memcached?

Tony Arcieri tony.arcieri at gmail.com
Fri Jul 19 23:21:40 UTC 2013


I think what would make a lot more sense, which could be done immediately,
is putting a caching HTTP proxy in front of Tahoe's web server


On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Patrick Logan <patrickdlogan at gmail.com>wrote:

> Are you suggesting putting memcached in *front* of LAFS? Or putting
> memcached somewhere *within* LAFS?
>
> Those seem like two very different kinds of systems that may be more
> or less appropriate to certain use cases.
>
> I would suggest finding the interesting use cases you want to
> investigate and then decide whether memcached and/or LAFS apply to any
> of those use cases.
>
> As it is, your original project seems overly broad, as well as putting
> the cart before the horse.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Steven Lee <elderry at outlook.com> wrote:
> > Hello, I am studying for my summer project and am interested in LAFS,
> this
> > morning my mentor mentioned that is that possible to deploy LAFS with
> > Memcached to improve its performance? Since I am not very familiar with
> the
> > both projects, I searched on Internet and found no one has ever been
> > interested in this, so I think there must be some reasons. Then what's
> your
> > opinions? Thanks in advance.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tahoe-dev mailing list
> > tahoe-dev at tahoe-lafs.org
> > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> tahoe-dev mailing list
> tahoe-dev at tahoe-lafs.org
> https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
>



-- 
Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20130719/822b1e5d/attachment.html>


More information about the tahoe-dev mailing list