Sybil attack?
Natanael
natanael.l at gmail.com
Mon Feb 16 11:14:27 UTC 2015
Den 16 feb 2015 11:42 skrev "Adonay Sanz" <adonay.sanz at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
> I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack
protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution?
Tahoe-LAFS in the default configuration don't rely on unknown nodes, so
there Sybil isn't a problem. And because of in-built authentication of all
data, a Sybil attack could at most prevent access to the data (or just to
chosen parts of or versions of the data), a form of denial of service.
Can't fake the data.
The I2P version could be affected (as it is configured to mimic Freenet).
Standard usage isn't.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20150216/5f36144b/attachment.html>
More information about the tahoe-dev
mailing list