Sybil attack?

[Adonay Sanz]

Hi Natanael
Thanks for answering. Really I'm noob in this area.

I wanted to use I2P version. So, it's no possible way present or future to
block it? It's a really threat?
Can you explainme better what it means "configured to mimic Freenet"?

Thanks a lot


Adonay


2015-02-16 12:14 GMT+01:00 Natanael <natanael.l at gmail.com>:

>
> Den 16 feb 2015 11:42 skrev "Adonay Sanz" <adonay.sanz at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack
> protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution?
>
> Tahoe-LAFS in the default configuration don't rely on unknown nodes, so
> there Sybil isn't a problem. And because of in-built authentication of all
> data, a Sybil attack could at most prevent access to the data (or just to
> chosen parts of or versions of the data), a form of denial of service.
> Can't fake the data.
>
> The I2P version could be affected (as it is configured to mimic Freenet).
> Standard usage isn't.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20150216/c9de0e97/attachment.html>