tahoe-lafs packaging issues

[jg71]

* Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:

> I've been paged out for a while, but previously looked after the
> tahoe-lafs package in pkgsrc, and am again because 2.7-only
> packages are causing extra maintenance burden and hence there is
> pressure to outright remove them.  Some of this may be well known,
> but I'll type more and assume less.

sigh. the situation is the same for tahoe-lafs at slackbuilds.org

when I asked recently on IRC for guidance in that regard I got this

<+rob0> jg71, lol, run away and join a traveling circus?  Or a monastery/convent? :)

to sum it up: I do not see a chance of tahoe-lafs staying at
slackbuilds.org if there is any py2 dependency.