[volunteergrid2-l] New Node

[Earney, Billy C.]

I try not to use IE if I don't have too.. :)

________________________________________
From: volunteergrid2-l-bounces at tahoe-lafs.org [volunteergrid2-l-bounces at tahoe-lafs.org] On Behalf Of Brad Rupp [bradrupp at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:12 PM
To: volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org
Subject: Re: [volunteergrid2-l] New Node

Sorry, Microsoft Internet Explorer.

I was just about to create a new thread on this.  I might as well
continue to use this one.  Will anyone have a broken heart if they
cannot use IE to access the gateway nodes?  Firefox and Chrome would
work fine.  I personally don't care and two others have stated that they
don't care.  Any other thoughts?

Thanks,

Brad

On 1/31/2011 12:06 PM, Jody Harris wrote:
> Weighing on on IE: "What's IE?" ;-)
> ----
> - Think carefully.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Brad Rupp <bradrupp at gmail.com
> <mailto:bradrupp at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 1/31/2011 7:28 AM, Shawn Willden wrote:
>
>         On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Brad Rupp <bradrupp at gmail.com
>         <mailto:bradrupp at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:bradrupp at gmail.com <mailto:bradrupp at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
>             That is a great idea Shawn.  Done.
>
>
>         Cool!
>
>         One suggestion.  Can you set up another node (with storage server
>         disabled) whose tub port is firewalled and make that node's
>         welcome page
>         accessible but protected behind a proxy?
>
>         The reason it's a good idea to set up a poorly-connected node
>         like that
>         is because then any other poorly-connected nodes will show as
>         red.  The
>         way Tahoe works is that if either one of a pair of nodes can
>         reach the
>         other, then they have bidirectional communication.  But we
>         really want
>         all nodes to be fully visible, so to verify that we need to check it
>         from a node that is not fully visible.  I'm not sure if I
>         explained that
>         well.
>
>
>     I can look into this, but it is going to be a bit before I can get
>     to it.
>
>
>
>             - I am unable to host this over SSL right now.  I don't
>         think that
>             should be a big deal.
>
>
>         Not huge, but it would be nice.  What's the obstacle?  A self-signed
>         cert should be fine.
>
>
>     I'm running another app over SSL.  Virtual hosting under Apache only
>     supports one cert for all virtual hosts.  The subject name would be
>     wrong and cause a browser warning on top of those you get with self
>     signed certs.
>
>
>
>             If we don't care about IE, I can get rid of the vg2 mapping.
>               Firefox and Chrome work fine either way.
>
>
>         I certainly don't care about IE.
>
>
>     I don't care about IE either.  I will send another e-mail out about
>     this so we can get a consensus.
>
>
>         --
>
>         Shawn
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         volunteergrid2-l mailing list
>         volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org
>         <mailto:volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org>
>         http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volunteergrid2-l
>         http://bigpig.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     volunteergrid2-l mailing list
>     volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org <mailto:volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org>
>     http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volunteergrid2-l
>     http://bigpig.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> volunteergrid2-l mailing list
> volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org
> http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volunteergrid2-l
> http://bigpig.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
_______________________________________________
volunteergrid2-l mailing list
volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org
http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volunteergrid2-l
http://bigpig.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome