[volunteergrid2-l] Should we increase the node minimum capacity?

[Jody Harris]

"I presume you mean 2 TB... 2 GB wouldn't do much good ;-)"

Heh!

I guess I was being hasty and not _thinking carefully_ while I was writing.

Oops!

j
----
Ph. 575-208-4567
- Think carefully.



On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Shawn Willden <shawn at willden.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Jody Harris <jharris at harrisdev.com> wrote:
>
>> Both of my nodes are currently just below the 500 GB limit. I honestly
>> thought it would never be a problem.
>>
> I want to be clear:  It's still not a problem.  If there's anyone who does
> find it a hardship to expand their storage, please don't feel shy about
> speaking up.  The terms under which everyone joined this grid specified 500
> GB, so it's wrong to require anyone to upgrade who doesn't want to.... so
> we have to have consensus.  Unless everyone agrees, we should stay at 500
> GB.
>
> One node is a little net top box from System76 -- I can add a 2 GB
>> external drive to that one.
>>
> I presume you mean 2 TB... 2 GB wouldn't do much good ;-)
>
>
>>  The other is my primary home desktop (always on), Tahoe is running on a
>> LVM comprised of a couple of retired 250 GB drives. I can just replace
>> those with a single drive and move on.
>>
> --
> Shawn
>
> _______________________________________________
> volunteergrid2-l mailing list
> volunteergrid2-l at tahoe-lafs.org
> http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volunteergrid2-l
> http://bigpig.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/volunteergrid2-l/attachments/20111103/32b65e83/attachment.html>