[volunteergrid2-l] Should we increase the node minimum capacity?
Iantcho Vassilev
ianchov at gmail.com
Sat Nov 5 05:55:08 UTC 2011
Hi to all,
I want to put my 2cents also.
I am on for expanding the grid.
The voting system looks promising and i think this is the best way a
community can decide.
For me 2/3 or 3/4 of the vote suffice and if a majority has voted then the
1/3 or 1/4 part has to agree with the new rules.
Also the transit period is a good option - 6 months is a lot of time so i
think for this current problem it is ok.
I also think that the people with 2 and more nodes should not have full
election rights for the node count.
That means that if i up 3 nodes now and i talk with Jody Haris we can make
voting comply to our arrangement.
Last and not least i vote for accounting system and access control.
We should have detailed statistics on operators shares, access time, load
etc and also we should control our introducer with more than simple hidden
url.
Regards,
Iantcho
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/volunteergrid2-l/attachments/20111105/465185f6/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the volunteergrid2-l
mailing list