[volunteergrid2-l] New Members

Christoph Langguth christoph at rosenkeller.org
Wed Apr 4 15:17:40 UTC 2012


Am 04.04.2012 16:10, schrieb Shawn Willden:

Thanks, Shawn, for... should I say "sorting it out"? I hope noone feels 
sorted out.

I'll just comment on your comments here.


> Here's a list of the recently-joined list members (in no particular order)
> who are applying to join the grid, and my proposal for each of them.  If I
> missed anyone, please speak up!  For current grid members, let me know if
> you disagree with my proposals, otherwise, I'm going to act on them :-)
>
>     - Benjamin (masterme120 at gmail.com):  Benjamin would like to join the
>     grid and has committed to maintaining high uptime and providing 1 TB of
>     disk, but has limited upstream bandwidth.  I propose to admit him, with the
>     reservation that if his bandwidth turns out to be problematic we may have
>     to ask him to leave again.
If the general goal is data security, then availability (uptime) is 
indeed more important than speed. Indeed, from a cheater's perspective, 
offering such a node would not make any sense at all, as our uploads on 
his node will be faster than his downloads. So yes, no problem at all 
from my side, as long as the node remains online.

>     - Eugen Leitl (eugen at leitl.org):  Eugen would like to join the grid and
>     has offered two nodes, both ~1TB, one in a data center and on a very fast
>     network connection and the other on his (decent) home connection.  He has
>     also committed to maintaining high uptime.  I propose to admit him.
That aside, Eugen also has a record of knowing what he does (google 
him). A most definite YES from my side.

>     - Leon Baum (leonbaum2 at gmail.com):  Leon would like to join the grid and
>     can manage the uptime requirement but isn't presently able to provide more
>     than 320 GB.  I propose to decline him -- but with encouragement to come
>     back when he can provide 500+ GB.
Agreed. I'm not opposed to anyone, but a 1GB drive costs almost nothing 
nowadays.

>     - Samuel Willcocks (samuel2 at willcockses.com):  Samuel has joined the
>     mailing list but not introduced himself or expressed his goals or intent.
dito.
>     - Michael J. O'Donnell (michael_odonnel at acm.org):  Michael so far would
>     just like to lurk and better understand the grid.
dito.
>     - Aaron Drew (aarond10 at gmail.com):  Aaron hasn't really introduced
>     himself on this mailing list, but did on tahoe-dev.  He can contribute 500
>     GB and is willing to meet the uptime requirements.  I propose to admit him,
>     with the same caveat as Benjamin.
... agreed, and: from what I read so far, Aaron has some experience with 
python, and would indeed be interested to help with tahoe development. 
I'm in favor of giving him full access, trusting that he's not going to 
bring down our particular grid.

>     - Eric Anapolsky (erpo41 at gmail.com):  Eric would like to join the grid
>     and will offer a node with 800 GB of RAID6 storage on a reasonable network
>     connection.  I propose to admit him.
>
yep.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6161 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/volunteergrid2-l/attachments/20120404/d662efc1/attachment.bin>


More information about the volunteergrid2-l mailing list