[zfec-dev] Redundancy ?
James Mills
prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Thu Oct 23 19:46:36 PDT 2008
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:36 AM, zooko <zooko at zooko.com> wrote:
> This sounds like the terminology in the README.txt might need to be
> improved. I think it is more standard to say that if m=12 and k=6
> then there is "2 X" redundancy, meaning that the aggregate size of
> the shares is two times the size of the input.
Please :)
If m=12 and k=6 from my understanding
and what you've just told me, the total
redundancy is therefore m/k times.
100% is a bit misleading, and an earlier
example in the same README.txt states
6% redundancy (no idea how that is
calculated either).
What you're saying however, does make sense.
Thanks for the clarification.
Great library/tool too! For me it's a case of ...
"What shall I do with it!" :)
cheers
James
--
--
-- "Problems are solved by method"
More information about the zfec-dev
mailing list