Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1698, comment 10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-09-05T05:55:02Z (10 years ago)
Author:
warner
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #1698, comment 10

    initial v1  
    11I've confirmed that running under the `coverage` executable gets us good
    2 data. When we first wrote this coverage code, there was no such
    3 executable, so we had to use that bwverbose-coverage plugin (and several
    4 related ones), to execute the `coverage.start()` and `.stop()` calls at
    5 the right times. In general, it's awesome that the coverage tool is so
    6 much easier to use now.
     2data. When we first wrote this coverage code, that executable wasn't so
     3easy to use (or at least I couldn't figure out how to use it correctly),
     4so we had to use that bwverbose-coverage plugin (and several related
     5ones), to execute the `coverage.start()` and `.stop()` calls at the
     6right times. In general, it's awesome that the coverage tool is so much
     7easier to use now.
    78
    89But, if the executable doesn't have a predictable name, and if we want a