Opened at 2007-04-28T19:06:21Z
Last modified at 2007-09-16T08:34:35Z
#16 closed defect
explain/justify our current Peer Selection — at Initial Version
| Reported by: | zooko | Owned by: | zooko |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | 0.6.0 |
| Component: | code-peerselection | Version: | 0.5.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Launchpad Bug: |
Description
also, if you get a chance, could you try and remember why we went with the 'Tahoe3' peer selection algorithm instead of the 'Tahoe2' first-100-peers-in-the-permuted-list approach? and maybe add it to the wiki under PeerSelection or I think there's a PeerSelection/TahoeThree? page waiting to be created? I wasn't able to remember our reasons when I wrote up the arch doc
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
