Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1851, comment 5
- Timestamp:
- 2013-11-28T22:05:13Z (11 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #1851, comment 5
initial v1 1 Actually I think that .although the above protocol allows correct behaviour for concurrent uploads of a file, it doesn't actually make the correct behaviour any easier than for the current protocol. (The problem is the fact that there's only provision for one copy of a given file in the 'incoming' directory, which is an implementation issue on the server side, not a protocol issue.)1 Actually I think that, although the above protocol allows correct behaviour for concurrent uploads of a file, it doesn't actually make the correct behaviour any easier than for the current protocol. (The problem is the fact that there's only provision for one copy of a given file in the 'incoming' directory, which is an implementation issue on the server side, not a protocol issue.)
