#2098 closed defect (fixed)
remove dependency on zbase32 and pyutil
Reported by: | daira | Owned by: | zooko |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | undecided |
Component: | packaging | Version: | 1.10.0 |
Keywords: | packaging pyutil zbase32 review | Cc: | |
Launchpad Bug: |
Description
These are weak dependencies in the sense that Tahoe-LAFS will work without them, but they have confused users and packagers (e.g. see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683331), and are potential sources of packaging bugs.
(This ticket conflicts with #47.)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed at 2014-03-15T15:48:54Z by daira
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed at 2014-03-15T16:22:28Z by daira
Zooko: these dependencies are only via zfec, correct?
comment:3 Changed at 2014-03-15T16:22:44Z by daira
- Owner set to zooko
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed at 2014-03-17T20:54:35Z by zooko
comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed at 2014-03-17T21:20:03Z by daira
Hmm, https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec gives an "Environment not found" error.
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed at 2014-03-18T01:46:40Z by zooko
Replying to daira:
Hmm, https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec gives an "Environment not found" error.
Fixed.
comment:7 Changed at 2014-03-18T23:32:58Z by daira
Filed against zfec as https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/zfec/ticket/17 .
comment:8 Changed at 2020-01-17T15:05:45Z by exarkun
- Keywords review added
comment:9 Changed at 2020-01-20T18:56:28Z by GitHub <noreply@…>
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
In c164473/trunk:
comment:10 Changed at 2020-07-13T18:37:59Z by itamarst
Note that I have reintroduced the dependency on pyutil as part of Python 3 port: there is enough duplicate code in pyutil that it's easier and nicer to just use the versions in pyutil. And since pyutil is indirect dependency anyway it wasn't adding any new dependencies.
Alan Fairless at SpiderOak? wrote:
dependent on each other.
zbase32 1.1.3, then pyutil 1.9.7, then upgrade zbase32 to 1.3.5.