Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #648, comment 27
- Timestamp:
- 2014-09-24T03:10:35Z (10 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #648, comment 27
initial v1 1 I like this idea, but I'd like to suggest a FR to go along with this Enhancement. Specifically I am concerned that the s ervernodes have no way to restrict how much disk space they use on a file system, other than the negative value provided by the reserved_space config option. Would this enhancement calculate and report as available only the difference between available disk space for the file system the node is running on and the reserved_space setting?1 I like this idea, but I'd like to suggest a FR to go along with this Enhancement. Specifically I am concerned that the storage nodes have no way to restrict how much disk space they use on a file system, other than the negative value provided by the reserved_space config option. Would this enhancement calculate and report as available only the difference between available disk space for the file system the node is running on and the reserved_space setting? 2 2 3 3 If there was a disk space setting, the reported disk space value for a storage node would be more accurate. For example, a storage node run on a volume group could all of a sudden find itself with expanded available space unintentionally, since adding more PV's to an LV would mean that the reserved_space value would grow the available node's capacity perhaps beyond that which a server admin originally intended.
