Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #668, comment 27
- Timestamp:
- 2011-01-18T06:06:39Z (14 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #668, comment 27
initial v1 4 4 > Shouldn't recommend, or should recommend against? 5 5 6 We should definitely focus o f [http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/trunk/docs/quickstart.html quickstart.html], and don'tpeople alternatives to quickstart.html unless they specifically ask or have some specific needs that don't fit quickstart.html.6 We should definitely focus on [http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/trunk/docs/quickstart.html quickstart.html], and don't offer people alternatives to quickstart.html unless they specifically ask or have some specific needs that don't fit quickstart.html. 7 7 8 8 I personally wouldn't go so far as to recommend ''against'' using {{{easy_install}}} just because it is sort of beyond the scope of Tahoe-LAFS. Once we merge #1054 then Tahoe-LAFS works with {{{easy_install}}} at least as well as any other Python package does, and people have developed their own opinions and techniques about it. On the other hand, [http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/668?replyto=23#comment:19 your specific reason] to recommend against it is novel as far as I know and potentially quite useful knowledge to others. It isn't Tahoe-LAFS specific and might be best expressed in a bug report or an email message to distutils-sig.