Changes between Initial Version and Version 2 of Ticket #913


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2010-01-18T04:27:48Z (15 years ago)
Author:
zooko
Comment:

I think Tahoe-LAFS is already technically well suited for this. Maybe it needs more documentation or another layer of automation? Why don't you try it and post ot this ticket how it works for you.

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #913 – Description

    initial v2  
    11Suggested by badon on IRC:
    22
    3 > Tahoe needs a slick method to aggregate drives on a single machine. Call it Tahoe drive spanning, or something like that. Then I can use all my obsolete drives again. They're otherwise too small to be useful, but together with Tahoe's fault tolerance, it could make RAID storage look restrictive. RAID has to have all the same size drives, or it'll waste the capacity of all but the smallest drive.
     3> Tahoe needs a slick method to aggregate drives on a single machine. Call it Tahoe drive spanning, or something like that. Then I can use all my obsolete drives again. They're otherwise too small to be useful, but together with Tahoe's fault tolerance, it could make RAID storage look restrictive. RAID has to have all the same size drives, or it'll waste the capacity of all but the smallest drive.