Changes between Version 37 and Version 38 of NewCaps/WhatCouldGoWrong

Timestamp:

2009-10-11T16:09:55Z (15 years ago)

Author:

davidsarah

Comment:

resistance to attack #7 depends on onewayness of hash

NewCaps/WhatCouldGoWrong

@@ -9 +9 @@
 ||5||unauthorized read||attack the encryption of the plaintext with ''K1''||anyone||any one file||the security of the encryption scheme used for the plaintext, and the secrecy of the encryption key ''K1''. The latter also depends on the security and seeding of the RNG that generated it.||''p''.2^''k''^||
 ||6||unauthorized read||figure out the input to the hash function that generates ''S''||anyone||any one file||the hash function's onewayness for (''R'',''T'') -> ''S''||brute force on ''R'' is !#2||
-||7||unauthorized deletion||brute force KD||anyone||any one file||secrecy of ''KD''||''p''/''N''.2^''d''^||
+||7||unauthorized deletion||brute force KD||anyone||any one file||the hash function's onewayness for ''KD'' -> ''Dhash'' and the secrecy of ''KD''||''p''/''N''.2^''d''^||
 ||8||unauthorized deletion||figure out a working destroy key KD from Dhash||anyone||any one file||the hash function's preimage resistance on ''Dhash''||''p''/''N''.2^min(''d'',''dh'')^||
 ||9||denial of service||prevent access to servers holding sufficient shares (by controlling some of them, or by attacking them or the network)||anyone||any file||not prevented by crypto||not applicable||