Changes between Version 45 and Version 46 of NewCaps/WhatCouldGoWrong


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2009-10-15T05:04:33Z (15 years ago)
Author:
davidsarah
Comment:

add URL for post about multicollision attacks

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • NewCaps/WhatCouldGoWrong

    v45 v46  
    37377. The formula given in the Wikipedia Birthday Attack page is sqrt(2.ln(1/(1-''p''))).2^(''r''+''t'')/2^, but the approximation given here is very accurate for small ''p'', and can only underestimate the cost. For ''p'' = 1/2 it underestimates by only a factor of 1.18. For ''p'' near 1 it underestimates severely; it is very hard for an attacker to be ''certain'' to find a collision.
    3838
    39 8. In order for the combined hash with output (''R'',''T'') to have the strength against collision and preimage attacks given here, there must not be multicollision attacks against the hash truncated to ''r'' bits or to ''t'' bits that would yield an easier attack on the combined hash. [ref mailing list article]
     398. In order for the combined hash with output (''R'',''T'') to have the strength against collision and preimage attacks given here, there must not be multicollision attacks against the hash truncated to ''r'' bits or to ''t'' bits, that would yield an easier attack on the combined hash. See http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2009-October/003006.html .