Changes between Version 28 and Version 29 of Packaging

Timestamp:

2011-07-17T23:24:20Z (13 years ago)

Author:

davidsarah

Comment:

bugs -> tickets

Packaging

@@ -94 +94 @@
  * setuptools has many bugs and is poorly maintained.
 
- * these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [[TicketQuery(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, count)]] open setuptools-related bugs ([query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools full list]) and have closed [[TicketQuery(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, count)]] such bugs ([query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools full list]). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
+ * these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [[TicketQuery(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, count)]] open setuptools-related tickets ([query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools full list]) and have closed [[TicketQuery(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, count)]] such tickets ([query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools full list]). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
 
  * maintaining our fork (which is necessary to avoid some of the bugs) takes up developer time and mental bandwidth that would be more productively spent on Tahoe-LAFS itself.