Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of ServerSelection


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2010-01-07T04:14:08Z (15 years ago)
Author:
davidsarah
Comment:

add ref to #872

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • ServerSelection

    v9 v10  
    44
    55 * allmydata.com wants to upload to a random selection, evenly distributed among servers which are not full; This is, unsurprisingly, what Tahoe v1.5 currently does.
    6  * Brian has mentioned that an allmydata.com-style deployment might prefer to have the servers with more remaining capacity receiving more shares, thus "filling up faster" than the servers with less remaining capacity.
     6 * Brian has mentioned that an allmydata.com-style deployment might prefer to have the servers with more remaining capacity receiving more shares, thus "filling up faster" than the servers with less remaining capacity (#872).
    77 * Kevin Reid wants, at least for one of his use cases, to specify several servers each of which is guaranteed to get at least K shares of each file, in addition to potentially other servers also getting shares.
    88 * Shawn Willden wants, likewise, to specify a server (e.g. his mom's PC) which is guaranteed to get at least K shares of certain files (the family pictures and movies files).
    … …  
    6969 * #466 (extendable Introducer protocol: dictionary-based, signed announcements)
    7070 * #467 (change peer-selection to allow introducerless explicit serverlist, alternative backends)
     71 * #872 (Adjust the probability of selecting a node according to its storage capacity (or other fitness measure))