Opened at 2012-03-13T20:45:09Z
Closed at 2012-03-27T21:25:57Z
#1686 closed defect (fixed)
update copyright notices
| Reported by: | davidsarah | Owned by: | davidsarah |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | 1.9.2 |
| Component: | packaging | Version: | 1.9.1 |
| Keywords: | copyright reviewed | Cc: | |
| Launchpad Bug: |
Description
There are copyright notices for AllMyData?, Inc. in setup.py and docs/man/tahoe.1, which should be updated to The Tahoe-LAFS Software Foundation.
Also, these files aren't the most obvious places to look, so I suggest adding a notice in README.txt, where the license terms are.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed at 2012-03-13T20:48:42Z by davidsarah
comment:2 Changed at 2012-03-13T20:52:31Z by davidsarah
- Keywords review-needed added
- Owner changed from somebody to zooko
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 1 ; follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed at 2012-03-13T21:09:13Z by zooko
Replying to davidsarah:
Hmm, the license terms are duplicated in README.txt and docs/about.rst. Should one of those point to the other?
Maybe. It got that way originally because Brian wanted an introductory README.txt which was readable without a web browser, but I wanted introductory files that had hyperlinks and nicer formatting. I wouldn't object to making README.txt be just a short text directing the reader to [docs/about.rst]. I would object to making the reader of about.rst look elsewhere for the licensing summary.
comment:4 Changed at 2012-03-13T21:10:56Z by zooko
- Keywords reviewed added; review-needed removed
- Owner changed from zooko to davidsarah
Reviewed attachment:1686-update-copyright.darcs.patch and saw no problem with it! Thank you!
comment:5 Changed at 2012-03-13T23:04:28Z by david-sarah@…
In e215af86464de533:
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed at 2012-03-27T21:25:57Z by davidsarah
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Replying to zooko:
Replying to davidsarah:
Hmm, the license terms are duplicated in README.txt and docs/about.rst. Should one of those point to the other?
Maybe. It got that way originally because Brian wanted an introductory README.txt which was readable without a web browser, but I wanted introductory files that had hyperlinks and nicer formatting.
I don't really care about the duplication in this case, so let's call it fixed.
Hmm, the license terms are duplicated in README.txt and docs/about.rst. Should one of those point to the other?