Changes between Version 42 and Version 43 of Bibliography


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2009-10-07T17:50:58Z (15 years ago)
Author:
zooko
Comment:

add estream

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Bibliography

    v42 v43  
    1010[http://cr.yp.to/snuffle.html#security Salsa20 Security Arguments] why Salsa20 is probably safe against this and that threat
    1111
    12 [https://online.tu-graz.ac.at/tug_online/voe_main2.getvolltext?pDocumentNr=81263 Cryptanalysis of the Tiger Hash Function] by Mendel and RIjmen
     12[http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/stream The European Stream Cipher project] which evaluated many stream ciphers including Salsa20
    1313
    1414[http://defectoscopy.com/results.html defectoscopy.com] a table of semi-automated cryptanalysis results from the inventors of EnRUPT.  This technique has not been peer-reviewed by other cryptographers.  I (Zooko) can't judge how valid it is.  Note that Tiger is one of only two hash functions that are predicted to be secure by this analysis -- the other is Whirlpool.  MD-4/5, SHA-0/1/2, and GOST are predicted to be insecure.  AES-128 is predicted to be insecure.  Salsa20 is predicted to be secure.
    … …  
    7373[http://cr.yp.to/chacha.html ChaChaCha20] even better stream cipher; It might be slightly safer than Salsa20 and it is certainly slightly faster on some platforms, but slightly slower on others.  However, the author of Salsa20 and !ChaChaCha20, Daniel J. Bernstein, seems to have settled on using Salsa20 (or a tweak of it named XSalsa20), so probably that is the one to use.
    7474
     75[https://online.tu-graz.ac.at/tug_online/voe_main2.getvolltext?pDocumentNr=81263 Cryptanalysis of the Tiger Hash Function] by Mendel and RIjmen