Changes between Version 46 and Version 47 of Bibliography


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2009-12-09T14:03:46Z (15 years ago)
Author:
zooko
Comment:

add link to google drive failure study

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Bibliography

    v46 v47  
    3232[http://www.cs.utk.edu/~plank/plank/papers/CS-08-625.pdf A Performance Comparison of Open-Source Erasure Coding Libraries] benchmarking some fec implementations including zfec
    3333
    34 == Local Filesystems ==
     34== Direct Attached Storage ==
     35
     36=== Local Filesystems ===
    3537
    3638[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.78.8911 Model-Based Failure Analysis of Journaling File Systems] [http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wind/Publications/sfa-dsn05.pdf PDF] compares ext3, reiserfs, and JFS under conditions of latent sector errors.  (Impatient people: read the Introduction and look at the table on page 9.)
    … …  
    4345
    4446(Summary: basically it looks to me (Zooko) like reiser3 is better-engineered for handling faults than are the other local filesystems.  See also the recent revelation that ext3 has been running with write barriers turned off all this time: http://lwn.net/Articles/283161 .)
     47
     48=== Disk Failure Rates ===
     49
     50[http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population] by google engineers
    4551
    4652